Ivie Anita,
The horrors they want us to forget.
I'm late on this one but, better late than never.
Related video 👇🏾
-snip-
Statistic: Total # of views as of Feb. 24, 2021 at 8:09 AM =1,003,330
****
Edited by Azizi Powell
This pancocojams post showcases a YouTube video of (Nigerian novelist) Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie's 2021 speech At Germany's Humboldt Forum about Europe returning stolen art work from Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
This pancocojams post includes information about Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie and information about the Humboldt Forum.
This post also includes an unofficial transcript of that speech that I made from the captions that were given in that YouTube video. This unofficial transcript contains some corrections to those captions that I made from listening to that video (such as "Berlin" for Bethleham and "Bonn" for back, and the last name of the Nigerian artist who is mentioned in that speech ). I also added capitalization, punctuation marks, paragraphs, and one notation given in brackets for Chimamanda Nogozi Adichie's small laugh and some people in the audience's clapping response at that interval in her speech. Additions and corrections are welcome.
The content of this post is presented for historical, socio-cultural, and educational purposes.
All copyrights remain with their owners.
Thanks to Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie for her writing and for this speech. Thanks to the Humboldt Museum for hosting this event and thanks to all those who are quoted in this post. Thanks also to Ivie Anita for publishing this video on YouTube.
****
INFORMATION ABOUT CHIMAMANDA NGOZI ADICHIE
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chimamanda_Ngozi_Adichie
"Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie … CHIM-ah-MAHN-də əng-GOH-zee ə-DEE-chay;[note 1] born 15 September 1977)[3][4] is a Nigerian writer whose works include novels, short stories and nonfiction.[5] She was described in The Times Literary Supplement as "the most prominent" of a "procession of critically acclaimed young anglophone authors [which] is succeeding in attracting a new generation of readers to African literature",[6] particularly in her second home, the United States.
Adichie, a feminist,[7][8][9] has written the novels Purple
Hibiscus (2003), Half of a Yellow Sun (2006), and Americanah (2013), the short
story collection The Thing Around Your Neck (2009), and the book-length essay
We Should All Be Feminists (2014).[10] Her most recent books are Dear Ijeawele,
or A Feminist Manifesto in Fifteen Suggestions (2017), Zikora (2020) and Notes
on Grief (2021).[11] In 2008, she was awarded a MacArthur Genius Grant.[1]"...
****
INFORMATION ABOUT THE HUMBOLDT FORUM
From
"The Humboldt Forum is a museum of non-European art on the
Museum Island in the historic centre of Berlin. Named in honour of the Prussian
scholars Wilhelm and Alexander von Humboldt, it combines three rebuilt baroque
façades of the former Royal Palace, a contemporary exterior overlooking the
Spree river and a modern interior designed by Franco Stella. Considered as the
"German equivalent" of the British Museum,[1] the Humboldt Forum will
mainly house the non-European collections of the Berlin State Museums, temporary
exhibitions and public events. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it opened
digitally on 16 December 2020[2] and became accessible for the general public
on 20 July 2021.
[…]
History
The Humboldt Forum incorporates two former museums, the
Ethnological Museum of Berlin and the Museum of Asian Art. Both had their roots
in the Ancient Prussian Art Chamber.
[…]
Controversy
The museum has become embroiled in controversy over its
ownership of looted art and other artifacts which were obtained from the German
colonial empire in Africa and Asia.[16][17] In 2018, it was at the center of a
debate about the legality of cultural heritage from former colonies in Germany,
drawing protests from art historians such as Bénédicte Savoy and activists, who
alleged the museum had not done enough to research the provenance and fails to
critically present ethnographic objects in its collection.[18][19]”…
UNOFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT OF CHIMAMANDA NGOZI ADICHIE'S 2021 SPEECH AT THE HUMBOLDT MUSEUM
[Applause]
President of the Federal Republic of Germany, Dr. Steinmeir, Mayor of Berlin,
minister of culture and media, Dr. Monica Grutas, Director of the Humboldt Forum, Professor Dagalo, ladies and gentlemen, good
afternoon, actually good morning ish, almost afternoon. Thank you for having me
here.
When I was researching my second novel Half Of A Yellow Sun, which is set
during the Nigerian Biafran war that started in 1967, a woman told me a story
about her elderly father. It was early
in the war and they were in the Biafran hometown feeling relatively safe
because the war seemed far away. Then
suddenly they heard the loud terrifying sounds of bombing very close to them
and they knew that they had only minutes to leave their home and run into the
interior for safety before the Nigerian soldiers arrived. The elderly father
was a wealthy man, but the only thing he rushed to take with him was his
ikenga, a piece of wood, a beautifully carved piece of wood. But it wasn’t just a piece of wood. It was also the repository of spiritual
meaning. The Ikenga represented his chi,
his personal spirit as well as his ancestors, his guardian angels.
I was struck by this story- This man, facing the possibility of never seeing
his home again choose the thing that mattered most to him. Of course, he cared about his material
possessions, but he believed that those could eventually be replaced while his
ikenga was irreplaceable.
There are ikengas in various museums all over the world today. And it is easy to forget as we stare and
admire them behind cold and clinical glass barriers that these are objects that
are religious, spiritual, sacred. Art lives in history and history lives in
art. Much of what we call African art
are also documents that tell stories.
Some are literal in the storytelling like the beautifully ornate Benin
stool that was sent to the Oba of Benin by his people when he was exiled by the
British and which he looked at immediately could deduce from the carvings the
state of his British plundered land. Other
sculptures and carvings are more metaphorical.
They speak to the dignity of the people- to their worldview, to their
aspirations. Some of the early Christian
missionaries across the African continent were very keen on destroying African
art, carved African deities which they told the Africans were just magic. I cannot help but wily wonder what could be
more magical than the story of a man who dies and then magically rises again, a
man who also manages to magically give his body as bread- and I say this, by
the way, as a newly returned Roman Catholic.
The point is that belief systems vary and as long as they feed the
spiritual needs of a people they are valid.
We cannot be dismissive of a belief system merely because it is
unfamiliar to us just as we cannot be dismissive of a history because we are
uncomfortable with it.
So I’d like to tell a small story about a Nigerian who’s married to [a] Belgium
[man] and has lived in Belgium for many years.
She said once that she was shocked that her son while being taught
Belgium history was taught nothing about Congo.
“They teach my son in school that he must help the poor Africans”, she
said. “But they don’t teach him about what Belgium did in Congo”. Now if Hassan does not learn that the modern
Congo state began 100 years ago as the personal property of a brutal Belgian
king who was desperate to get wealthy from ivory and rubber; if her son does
not learn that the hands of Congolese were chopped off with rusty axes for not
producing enough resources to meet the cast, because we can collectively
acknowledge that it is so…
It is not Europe has denied its colonial history- that would be too crude. It is instead that Europe has developed a way
of telling the story of its colonial history that ultimately seeks to erase
that history.
The former French Prime Minister Nicholas Sarkozy gave a now infamous speech in
Senegal in which he said “I have not come to deny mistakes or crimes. Mistakes were made and crimes committed. But no one can ask of the generations of
today to expiate the crimes perpetrated by past generations.” This is central to the story that Europe
tells itself about its colonial history.
It is a story that basically says that yes colonialism happened,
but. And whatever comes after the “but”
is the focus of the story. What the
focus on the “but” does is that it absolves.
It frees Europe of responsibility, of a significant and traceable
connection to the African present and it allows Europe the glow of
charity. But the truth is that the past
does not merely tell us what happened yesterday. It also illuminates what happens today.
If we acknowledge that present-day Europe is shaped by the Renaissance of 600
years ago, by the Enlightenment of 300 years ago, then surely, we cannot say
that what happened merely 100 years ago in Africa no longer matters. It matters.
We are gathered today in this reconstructed palace, a beautiful place, but also
a place that represents Germany’s nostalgia for imperial times. When Kaiser William the second lived here,
German troops were killing children, women, and men in South West Africa. This building says that German history
matters even in a romanticized form. The
history of Africa and Asia and Latin American must matter as well. We cannot pick and choose which histories and
which points of views still matter because to do this would be an ugly exercise
of brute power.
And, speaking of power, here’s a headline I just read in a German publication…
The headline says “Where do Africa’s treasures belong?” Now imagine this headline differently. Imagine if it said “Where do Germany’s
treasures belong?” It would be a
redundant question because, of course, Germany’s treasures belong in
Germany. But the question would never
even be asked because there would be no circumstance in which it would be.
Because of power.
And so it seems to me that what we are fundamentally grappling with in this
space, in all of these questions about the Humboldt Forum, is power, unequal
power; how we navigate unequal power relations. And there’s always been to me
something shabby about unequal power relations. The victory feels colorless, almost unearned.
So I spoke of Belgium and its colonial history.
But what of Germany and its colonial history? Do school children here learn about Namibia,
what was called the German South West Africa?
Do school children know one hundred thousand Herrera people were
murdered by the Germans? Do they know of
the wells that were poisoned? Do they
know of the women who were used as sex slaves and others as slaves in German
camps? Do they know of the Nama people
killed and of the Majimaji revolt in German East Africa?
And why should they know? Because to
tell only part, one part of the story is essentially to lie. A story is true only when it is complete.
Germany is Berlin and German is Bonn and Germany is also its
colonial atrocities that have resulted in hundreds of African skulls being
stored here in the basements of museums here in Berlin- skulls of men whose
spirits cannot be at rest. Men, who
could well had been my great-grandfather had I happened to be born in eastern
rather than western Africa.
It is only fair to fully own all of the stories of Germany. All countries have parts of their pasts that
they’re not proud of, that they would rather forget. But it takes courage to face those parts and
bring in some light. And this is a time
for courage, the courage to hear dissenting voices such as those of the people
who are outside right now protesting.
They should be heard and included.
They have valid concerns. The
courage not merely to say “We take your criticism.” But to follow it with
action. The courage to say “We were
wrong.” The courage to say about art
acquired illicitly “This is not ours.
Tell us what to do with it.” The courage to do provenance work and
actively use local knowledge. The courage
to act and to act now and not become crippled by endless planning and endless
talking. The courage to believe that it
can be better. We cannot change the
past. But we can change our blindness to the past.
And why, by the way, is the term “ethnological” used for arts used from certain
parts of the world and not for other parts of the world? And then in discussing some of this art that
we term “ethnological”-and I would argue that the language itself already suggests
a hierarchy of value- when we talk about this art that was stolen, we’re told
that it cannot be returned to Africa, for example, because Africans would not
take good care of them. It is not merely
condescending to say “I cannot return what I stole from you because you will
not take good care of it.” It is also
lacking in basic logic. Since when has
the basis of ownership been taking good care of what is owned? This position is paternalistic arrogance of
the most stunning sort. It does not
matter whether Africans or Asians or Latin Americans can take care of the art
stolen from them. What matters is that
it is theirs.
The brilliant Nigerian artist Victor Ehikhamenor put it much better than I could
and in very Nigerian terms. He said “If I come and steal your wrapper and I say
I won’t give you back your wrapper because you will not tie it properly around
your waist or you will not wash it well and so the colors will fade, or this or
that, all are irrelevant. The wrapper is
mine and I can do with it what I will.
Give me back my wrapper because it is mine.” The metaphorical “wrapper”- for those of you
who are befuddled by “wrapper”, it’s a piece of cloth- should be returned for
the reason that Ehikhamenor illustrates which is respecting the property of others. But also because Europe has defined itself as
a place of certain values- progress, liberty, fraternity, tolerance, individual
rights, and most of all the rule of law.
A nation that believes in the rule of law cannot possibly be debating
whether to return stolen goods. It just
returns them. And so, if the dignity of
those from whom the art was stolen does not matter, then surely this idea
should matter- that Europe should be what it claims to be, live up to the
ideals with which you define yourself.
I should pause here and note that sometimes these conversations run the risk of
sounding like empty moralizing or like asking for the impossible or the
unrealistic or insisting on an unattainable purity and perfection Obviously, I don’t think that everything
should be sent back to the countries from which they came-not everything was
stolen. But those things that are
sacred; those things from whom people were killed; those things that have the
stains of innocent blood should be returned.
Obviously, we do not have all the information.
There are facts lost in unrecorded history. But we can draw reasonable
conclusions based on information that we do have. We can deduce, for example, that the Ngonzo,
the beautiful sculpture of the founder and guiding spirit of the Enso people of
Cameroon, the former German colony, could not possibly been obtained under
benign circumstances because why would you willingly give up your guiding
spirit?
It is also important to remember that not all wounds are visible. Some wounds we carry in our hearts, inherited
from our parents, passed on to our children.
But this discourse is, of course, not just about the Humboldt
Forum. It is about museums all over
Europe, in France, and the Vatican, in Britain.
And I must acknowledge that Germany is the first of the powerful
European nations that has made a gesture towards returning the Benin
bronzes. But it is also interesting that
the announcement said that a substantial amount would be returned, which made
me wonder how this would be determined and by whom. And it is equally interesting that it is British colonial loot rather than German colonial loot that is being
returned by Germany. But still, it is
progress. And Germany’s action, this
gesture towards righting what is wrong must be acknowledged. My acknowledgement of it is not to say that
the work is done, but the work has started and perhaps a place like the British
museum -and I know that Neil is here-which owns the majority of the Benin
bronzes, might perhaps be inspired by the German decision. And that, hopefully,
the British museum will rethink [Chimamanda laughs softlyand a small
number of people in the audience clap] and that hopefully, hopefully, the
British museum will rethink its policy of retain and explain…which is
unacceptable.
So this is the Humboldt Forum. A forum
usually implies, among other things, a space created for a free exchange of
ideas. One can only hope that the Humboldt Forum will live up to its name as a
space for true intercultural and transcultural exchange of ideas in mutual
respect between the cultures. But this
rhetoric free exchange of ideas must be practical. And by that I mean such
things as travel visas. It must be easy
for people from Africa, Asia, and Latin America who should participate in these
conversations to get travel visas.
The Humboldt Forum was conceived as a place to tell the universal story of the human race from multiple perspectives. This is a commendable idea, but it is incomplete because again we must confront the issue of power. Who tells the story? Who is the teller and who is told about? Who decided that African art should be labeled “ethnological”? Who has the right to exhibit the other? [Applause] Can the Humboldt Forum be an opportunity? Can it become-among other things-a project of remembering, solemn, honest, mutual, and respectful.
In conclusion, I want to say that I believe very much in dialogue. And I really believe that we can recreate the
world by acting more courageously. To
act with courage is to have concrete hope in a better future. We carve out a small space of the world. We shape and we reshape it and in that way,
small slice by small slice, we walk -slowly yes- but we walk on the path to real
progress. Courage and hope
are intertwined. Courage is an act of
hope. And hope is born of courage. Acts of courage creates hope. And there is
nothing more essential to the human spirit than hope. So here’s to courage. Thank you. [Applause]"
****
Thanks for visiting pancocojams.
Visitor comments are welcome.
Hi! Amazing find this transcript. Thank you for the great job!
ReplyDeleteYou're welcome, Anonymous. I was so impressed with this lecture that I looked for an official transcript. Not finding one, I took the liberty to transcribe it myself for the historical record.
DeleteBest wishes.